Powered by WebAds

Friday, November 09, 2012

Coincidence? Obama lost in every state with a photo ID law

And you thought the Democrats opposed voter identification laws because they prevent people who are entitled to vote from voting. Err.... Not exactly.
Curiously, Obama lost in every state that requires a photo ID to be produced before voting. A list of closely contested state elections with no voter ID, which narrowly went to Obama include: Minnesota (10), Iowa (6), Wisconsin (10), Nevada (6), Colorado (9), New Mexico (5) and Pennsylvania (20).
And yes, that's enough electoral votes to change the result.

The picture at the top is an Israeli teudat zehut (identification card) and yes, you must have one to vote in our elections. 

Labels: ,

4 Comments:

At 11:04 AM, Blogger Chayma said...

Learn to accept rejection like a man, baby

Hate to say, I told ya so! :)

 
At 2:39 PM, Blogger Empress Trudy said...

It's also possible that wherever the DNC was unable to legally defeat those bills they're sufficiently right wing as to pull the judges along with them in which case Obama would lose anyway. Now if Obama won Oklahoma you'd have a case for voter fraud on its face.

 
At 7:18 PM, Blogger Joe Yangtree said...


Let's take a closer look at your listed states (all based on current vote totals):

Minnesota -- Obama won 52.8% to 45.2% (1,544,861 to 1,321,508); a 7% victory with around 200,000 votes difference
Iowa -- Obama won 52.1% to 46.5% (816,429 to 727,928); a 5% victory with around 80,000 votes difference
Wisconsin -- Obama won 52.8% to 46.1% (1,613,950 to 1,408,746); a 6% victory with around 200,000 votes difference
Nevada -- Obama won 52.3% to 45.7% (528,801 to 462,422); a 6% victory with around 60,000 votes difference
Colorado -- Obama won 51.2% to 46.5% (1,239,490 to 1,125,391); a 6% victory with around 110,000 votes difference
New Mexico -- Obama won 52.9% to 43.0% (408,312 to 331,915); a 9% victory with around 70,000 votes difference
Pennsylavnia -- Obama won 52.0% to 46.8% (2,907,488 to 2,619,583); a 5% victory with around 280,000 votes difference

So, your hypothesis is that several hundred thousand people committed in-person voter fraud, a felony, on election day, and that, as far as I know, none were caught. Note that in-person voter fraud is the only kind of fraud that is prevented by ID checks.

In addition, you have to believe that these people somehow managed to fake out the pollsters in these states for months, as Obama showed consistent polling leads in all of them.

Please tell me how this makes sense in any fashion?

 
At 2:44 AM, Blogger Liberalmann said...

This prove that voter ID laws were put in place to suppress the votes of those who primarily vote Democrat.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Google